Differences From Artifact [08f3dbeadf]:

To Artifact [8c9838f5ec]:


20
21
22
23
24
25
26









27
























































28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39












20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92












93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104







+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
;;     [(_ s x y) (if (s:get s) x y)]))
;; ;; 
;; (define-syntax s:if-test
;;   (syntax-rules ()
;;     [(_ s x) (if   (string=? "yep" s)   x (list "s:if not"))]
;;     [(_ s x y) (if (string=? "yep" s) x y)]))

;; Some of these routines use:
;;
;;     http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~gfb/scheme/simple-macros.html
;;
;; Syntax for defining macros in a simple style similar to function definiton,
;;  when there is a single pattern for the argument list and there are no keywords.
;;
;; (define-simple-syntax (name arg ...) body ...)
;;

(define-syntax define-simple-syntax
  (syntax-rules ()
    ((_ (name arg ...) body ...)
     (define-syntax name (syntax-rules () ((name arg ...) (begin body ...)))))))

;;======================================================================
;; syntatic sugar items
;;======================================================================

;; We often seem to want to include stuff if a conditional is met
;; otherwise not include it. This routine makes that slightly cleaner
;; since using a pure if results in #<undefined> objects. (admittedly they 
;; should be ignored but this is slightly cleaner I think). 
;;
;; NOTE: This has to be a macro or the true clause will be evaluated 
;; whether "a" is true or false

;; If a is true return b, else return '()
(define-simple-syntax (s:if a b)
  (if a b '()))


;; Using the Simple-Syntax System
;; 
;; The syntax for defining macros in this system is similar to that for defining functions. In fact if the macro has a fixed number of arguments the syntax is identical. For example:
;; 
;;   ; Define a simple macro to add a value to a variable.
;;   ;
;;   (define-simple-syntax (+= variable value)
;;     (set! variable (+ variable value)))
;; 
;;   ; Use it.
;;   ;
;;   (define v 2)
;;   (+= v 7)
;;   v ; => 9
;; 
;; For a fixed number of arguments followed by an unknown number of arguments we use ... after a single argument to represent the unknown number (possibly zero) of arguments. For example, let's revise our definition of += to allow zero or more values to be added:
;; 
;;   ; Define a simple macro to add a zero or more values to a variable
;;   ;
;;   (define-simple-syntax (+= variable value ...)
;;     (set! variable (+ variable value ...)))
;; 
;;   ; Use it
;;   ;
;;   (define v 2)
;;   (+= v 7)
;;   v ; => 9
;;   (+= v 3 4)
;;   v ; => 16
;;   (+= v)
;;   v ; => 16
;; 


(define-macro (s:if-param varname . dat)
  (match dat
	 (()    '())
	 ((a)    `(if (s:get ,varname) ,a '()))
	 ((a b)  `(if (s:get ,varname) ,a ,b))))

(define-macro (s:if-sessionvar varname . dat)
  (match dat
	 (()    '())
	 ((a)    `(if (s:session-var-get ,varname) ,a '()))
	 ((a b)  `(if (s:session-var-get ,varname) ,a ,b))))

;; (define-macro (s:if-param varname . dat)
;;   (match dat
;; 	 (()    '())
;; 	 ((a)    `(if (s:get ,varname) ,a '()))
;; 	 ((a b)  `(if (s:get ,varname) ,a ,b))))
;; 
;; (define-macro (s:if-sessionvar varname . dat)
;;   (match dat
;; 	 (()    '())
;; 	 ((a)    `(if (s:session-var-get ,varname) ,a '()))
;; 	 ((a b)  `(if (s:session-var-get ,varname) ,a ,b))))
;;